Jane Jacobs - The Death And Life Of Great American Cities

JANE JACOBS THE DEATH AND LIFE OF GREAT AMERICAN CITIESJane Jacobs 1961 work The sledding and Life of Great American Cities examines the problems with post-World war II urban planning and argue that cities should embrace visual and loving transition , fundamental interaction , and mixed uses in neighborhoods . She aims her most pointed criticisms at the portentous urban renewal projects of the 1950s and `60s , which she argues disrupted neighborhood fabrics and worse urban conditions instead of improving themQUESTION ONEJacobs argues that great cities require must(prenominal) smack beyond simply neighborhoods and take a more than holistic approach , with safe streets clear delineations between macrocosm and cliquish spaces , small blocks , and unhopeful-rise buildings from which the sidewalks be easily perceptib le . Great urban environments literally start with the streets and sidewalks , where people interact with both angiotensin-converting enzyme another throughout the day and the built environment . merry cities need and should encourage genial interactions , sop up a variety of uses (residential and commercial should have spaces that allow such(prenominal) interaction ( same safe streets and parks , and should embrace a ground take of social and visual diversity . She also maintains that cities do not need to be decentralized or redistributed , as planners of the time were doing , and that planners must heed cities social and physical realities signifier of than imposing theories . Urban renewal projects often fail because they are too large in scale , want divers(a) amenities (many were mostly commercial projects for example , and were homogeneous spaces where social interaction did not frequently occur throughout the dayQUESTION TWOForms of social interaction (other than those created by public spaces like so! cial organizations and residential classes caution because they unite people from different backgrounds and neighborhoods , and heathen organizations help acquire and include newcomers , who often find urban behavior isolate and alienating . They need to transcend neighborhood and ethnic boundaries , as Jacobs says , [City] people are mobile .

[and] are not stuck with the provincialism of a neighborhood , any why should they be ? Isn t great choice and rich opportunity the point of cities (Jacobs 116 ) isolation , Jacobs claims , is drear for cities because it contributes more to crime and slum developmen t than low income aloneQUESTION THREEJacobs believes that post-World War II urban planners had good intentions but utilise conflicting methods of dealing with cities , often because they adhered to theories instead of examining cities realities which often contradicted the theories and principles they use . In addition , she claims they had an innate fear and disdain for cities favoring suburbs (much like the federal government did , with highway construction and the FHA s suburban mold ) and applying methods to cities that unmarked the conditions necessary for social interaction and public natural synthetic rubber . Planners often embraced urban renewal projects such as storeyed housing projects and large commercial complexes , which failed because their size discouraged cloudless monitoring of the sidewalks and streets , did not generate sufficient pedestrian origin at all times of day , lacked a dimension of amenities with residences , and promoted more danger an d less use than...If you lack to get a full essay, o! rder it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay