DIFFERENCES AND SIMILARITIES BETWEEN SPOKEN AND WRITTEN LANGUAGE: Manner of mathematical product: Spoken text is transient unless it is recorded. in that respectfore, it is imperfect and it is ever so feasible to do on-line editing and negotiate meaning. written texts be relatively permanent and this enables them to be surveyed and consulted. These texts argon the products of profuse drafts, which withdraw extensive checking and editing. The relative permanence of written texts overly completelyow them to be portable. Contextual features: The interlocutors share the same spaciotemporal context. Communication gum olibanum shows an on-line monitoring, which benefits from the addressees quick feedback and the abundance of contextual cues (visual clues much(prenominal) as body spoken way of speaking and gestures; auditory clues like diversity in stair of voice, hesitations, pauses, etc). Written texts are decontextualised or autonomous as they cannot take care on the addressees contributions or on early(a) contextual clues. There is no common spatial relation, as in face-to- face interaction. The situation has to be inferred from the text.
Also, the words need to set out all shades of meaning, which in spoken text are relayed by paralinguistic cues. Linguistic features: The syntax in spoken wrangle is typically less structured than that of written language; for example, spoken language contains incomplete sentences, fragments of speech, and little subordination. In written language the sentences are complete, and better structured with embedded clauses. Similarities: The mai! n similarity amid written and spoken language is that they are both implement to transfer information from one party to another, either formal, or informal. Word Count = 248 Reference = Dr. David Nunan 1993, (Discourse Analysis)If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.